From the late 1890s through the 1920s, a new set of nonprofit, business-funded organizations spearheaded an American campaign against commercial duplicity. These new organizations shaped the legal terrain of fraud, built massive public-education campaigns, and created a private law-enforcement capacity to rival that of the federal government. Largely born out of a desire among business elites to fend off proposals for extensive regulatory oversight of commercial speech, the antifraud crusade grew into a social movement that was influenced by prevailing ideas about social hygiene and emerging techniques of private governance. This initiative highlighted some enduring strengths of business self-regulation, such as agility in responding to regulatory problems; it also revealed a key weakness, which was the tendency to overlook deceptive marketing when practiced by firms that were members of the business establishment.
Wednesday, June 17, 2009
Balleisen on American Business Self-Regulation
Posted by Dan Ernst
Edward J. Balleisen, Duke University, has posted Private Cops on the Fraud Beat: The Limits of American Business Self-Regulation, 1895–1932, which originally appeared in Business History Review 83 (Spring 2009): 113–160. Here is the abstract: